4 ms·
I wonder why this is a problem. Maybe our problem is with the assumption that companies should last forever in the first place. If it was not so difficult and s
by seiferteric 7y ago
I wonder why this is a problem. Maybe our problem is with the assumption that companies should last forever in the first place. If it was not so difficult and stressful to change jobs, I think it would be better if more companies only existed for as long as they were useful/initiative, but when the steam runs out they are liquidated and everyone can walk away happily.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoAnything that would make transitions between roles easier for employees during destruction of orgs sounds like good policy to support economic dynamism. A convo for another thread.
- coliveira 7y agoThese things include universal health care, decent unemployment benefits, job retraining, child care, all things that business people hate because they need to be paid (usually from taxes).
- piva00 7y agoNot only because they need to be paid but also because they give leverage to the employee. You can see this in action with the healthcare system in the US, being dependent on your employer for healthcare gives them a huge leverage over an employee, business (on average) will always fight against policies that remove their leverage towards a more equal field.