4 ms·
>because of additional language that applies the policy retroactively “so losses in 2018 and 2019 can be ‘carried back’ against the past five years.” Damn, mus
by mywittyname 7y ago
>because of additional language that applies the policy retroactively “so losses in 2018 and 2019 can be ‘carried back’ against the past five years.”
Damn, must be nice.
- andrei_says_ 7y agoSurely this is what I’m paying taxes for. Could go to healthcare for all, fixing my roads and access to education, creating a strong resilient nation for all of us. But this is so much better.
- cultus 7y agoThis is what an oligarchy looks like.
- andrei_says_ 7y agoWouldn’t it be nice to have “oligarch-democrat” as explicitly stated as “social-democrat”? Everywhere a candidate’s name is printed.
- mattkrause 7y agoIndeed, each of these checks would pay for a staff scientist (at the NIH or a research university) for the next few decades. Or a teacher. And arguably, had we done that then we wouldn't be dealing with this now.
- einpoklum 7y agoDon't forget a lot of your federal taxes go to financing overseas wars and other military interventions. Some of it also goes to prop up oppressive regimes; and lets not forget funding Al-Qaeda-associated Islamist fundamentalist militias.