Why in the world would you quote "experts" and clearly you know nothing about statistics if you look at 181 patients and immediately think "oh well that's just

Why in the world would you quote "experts" and clearly you know nothing about statistics if you look at 181 patients and immediately think "oh well that's just too small!" You can have significant results with as little as 10 random samples. People are mad because this is getting pushed as a treatment for COVID-19. The only correct response is: "We do not have evidence that this a treatment for COVID-19." As more research is done we can update our knowledge on this, but instead you talk about the "experts" like they you know more than they do. Typical anti-academic rhetoric.