3 ms·
“Bluetooth” in general maybe, but have you used AirPods or any of the Beats headphones with the H1 chip? They are extraordinary.
by briandear 7y ago
“Bluetooth” in general maybe, but have you used AirPods or any of the Beats headphones with the H1 chip? They are extraordinary.
- iso1631 7y agoI'm fortunate that I have my own office so don't need to worry about headphones during the working day - just have multiple speakers. How do these extraordinary headphones cope with sources from a TV, computer, laptop, phone, and test kit, which I want at different levels and outputs? A £50 mixer takes these inputs (almost all from 3.5mm sources) and brings them all together via a reliable tactile interface. On the road of course I only tend to have to choose between 2 sources, so perhaps beats can approach the utility of a 3.5mm audio cable.
- dewey 7y agoYou do realize that what you are describing is an edge and most users don't have a use case for 5 connections including a "test kit" right? If a phone would have to cater to all these edge cases we'd still have serial ports on them.
- iso1631 7y agoWired headphones cater for these edge cases. As I say, I can live with a dongle for 3.5mm or serial (despite it being a regression), it's just another straw. The certainty and simplicity of an audio jack is not valueless though, no matter how many people on HN say it is.
- dewey 7y ago> The certainty and simplicity of an audio jack is not valueless though Nobody is saying that audio jacks are valueless in general, just that it's reasonable for a mass market device where it has value for a small % of people to not have it.