3 ms·
One could also ask the question "how many people would prefer to have a phone that didn't --need-- a case"? Given the choice between a thin phone that needs a
by slantyyz 7y ago
One could also ask the question "how many people would prefer to have a phone that didn't --need-- a case"?
Given the choice between a thin phone that needs a case and a phone that is as thick as a thin phone with a case that is more durable, possibly has a headphone jack and a slightly larger battery, I would personally go for the latter.
- therealdrag0 7y agoOh for sure. But does such a phone exist? The previous design with square sides certainly wasn't that.
- slantyyz 7y agoThey used to be more plentiful before everyone started copying Apple. When I had an iPhone 3G and iPhone 4, I did not use a case. All I used was a vinyl decal to protect the back, and I was fine. IIRC, my Moto G and Moto X Play were fine without an add-on case. All I used on those was a tempered glass screen protector.
- auiya 7y agoIf a phone is designed so the screen always breaks when it hits the ground unless it's protected by a case, it would make more sense to manufacture the phone inside a case already, no? I.e. make a raised rubber bezel around the screen's edge part of the standard design.