2 ms·
Interesting, will have to look at Canons DO lenses, not heard of them before.
by anfractuosity 7y ago
Interesting, will have to look at Canons DO lenses, not heard of them before.
- petepete 7y agoNikon's PF lenses, of which there are only 2 (300mm f4 PF and 500mm f5.6 PF) are worth a look too. I have the 300PF and it's smaller and lighter than a 24-70mm and plenty sharp. The 500PF has been sold out since launch. https://i.imgur.com/o4kNzNy.jpg https://i.imgur.com/o4kNzNy.jpg
- Wistar 7y agoI have had the 70-300 DO for about 12 years and find it to be a lackluster lens and seldom use it (never). https://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/70-300mm-do-is.htm https://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/70-300mm-do-is.htm I agree with Ken Rockwell's review of the lens except I add that it just doesn't have the color and contrast "pop" of equivalent lenses such as the 100-400 L II zoom. One thing, though, the used price for the DO lens is low.