3 ms·
I don't see how losing their older relatives to a virus that they could have avoided doesn't qualify those people as "impacted".
by the_hoser 7y ago
I don't see how losing their older relatives to a virus that they could have avoided doesn't qualify those people as "impacted".
- s9w 7y agoThis is the same logic as saying women were most affected by war since they lost their husbands. edit: how on earth was this [dead]ed
- the_hoser 7y agoNo, it's not. I'm not saying that people losing their relatives are somehow more impacted than those who die. I'm simply saying that you can't say that categories of people more likely to survive an infection aren't impacted.