4 ms·

To be fair, if the deadline is short and if it's indeed unclear which activity Amazon is allowed to do now, taking a moment to figure that out is not that bad o

• mirekrusin 7y ago
  Yeah, 24h, sometimes I'm waiting for simple email reply longer, bit tight.
• bluntfang 7y ago
  >taking a moment to figure that out is not that bad of an idea. This is a tax. The whole point is that they should've been doing this from the start. They've had 4 months of moments to figure out how to keep their workers safe, and the fact that they have union busting history makes this all worse.
  • syshum 7y ago
    The best way to keep the workers safe, is to send them home Now people complain that they are sending them home Amazon is just todays "big evil corporation" and nothing they do will be "correct"
    • barbecue_sauce 7y ago
      If the shoe fits.
    • bluntfang 7y ago
      >Now people complain that they are sending them home AFAICT the only people complaining are the ones complaining that Amazon shouldn't have to protect their employees.
      • deleted 7y ago
        [deleted]
• munchbunny 7y ago
  The court's ask seems reasonable given the circumstances, but 24 hours to deal with a complex logistical problem is... kind of like management pulling deadlines out of their ass that no rational person thinks is actually possible. If the deadline was, say, 1 week, then I'd agree that it seems like a fair demand.
  • deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
  • makapuf 7y ago
    1 week delay for the whole company would cost them 7 millions IIUC. not that expensive all things considered.
• ldng 7y ago
  To be fair, they've been warned several times ... If they're not happy, they can leave. It's not like we don't have other (law complying) marketplaces.
  • bdcravens 7y ago
    That's essentially what they've done, at least temporarily.