3 ms·
I can only see this being the case if you exist in a community which is a zero-sum competition for resources. This is not the world as I understand it, and I ca
by simtel20 6y ago
I can only see this being the case if you exist in a community which is a zero-sum competition for resources. This is not the world as I understand it, and I can't understand why you thinks this helps.
- renewiltord 6y agoIt’s the model most practise, except I do so knowingly. I’m Not against information sharing. It’s just that I do so in a parochially altruistic manner. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04981 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04981 Besides we all know everyone will gladly partake in a negative sum game if it means they come out better. I just do that knowingly. That is, if other participants have x and I have y, I will gladly take actions that lead to long-term effects of me having y+delta and them having x-epsilon even if delta < n times epsilon. Everyone gladly does this. So I don’t have a zero sum view of the world but that’s irrelevant to this because the sum of human utility is less important than the utility to my parochial group. A practical example is that I will often share stuff I know better than others but I won’t try too hard to convince them.