3 ms·

why not use git natively? I've never understood why people use git in WSL since the IO performance isn't great

• dleslie 7y ago
  I use Emacs in WSL, along with a suite of other tools like rust-analyzer, and the experience is _lightyears_ beyond trying to run those tools under regular Windows.
  • mtzet 7y ago
    Can't you just store your repositories in the ext4 partition then?
    • dleslie 7y ago
      I need them available to Windows tools, like Visual Studio and Unity.
      • nindalf 7y ago
        I think the popular Windows development tools will get support for remote development with WSL. JetBrains is working on it for IntelliJ and I can't imagine Visual Studio will be far behind.
        • dleslie 7y ago
          I need it working fast now. I won't upgrade to WSL2 until its speed is improved.
• tsimionescu 7y ago
  Unfortunately Git on Windows is also extremely slow. Especially using Magit in emacs, which does a lot of git calls, works much, much faster for me if it's sshing to a Linux VM for each call then running natively on Windows.
  • jfkebwjsbx 7y ago
    That may have been the case in the past, but Microsoft put some effort into making Git faster in Windows. Also, remember to disable the antivirus for your Git folder!
    • tsimionescu 7y ago
      If only that were up to me... Company laptop, company antivirus, company code...
  • vbezhenar 7y ago
    Git is not slow for me. Don't know about Emacs, but I'm using git from command line and from Idea and it works just fine, instantly for ordinary tasks. Commiting 1000+ files takes few seconds. Given the fact that Git is used for Windows development with monster monorepository, I think that something's wrong with your setup rather than Git on Windows in general.
    • tsimionescu 7y ago
      Git itself is decent, the problem is that Magit calls git a lot of times for a single GUI action. For some things, it can call git 5-10 times for a single key press. If every git invocation is around 1 second, that becomes a noticeable delay...