3 ms·
The author starts by criticising a bike-shedding mentality and then goes on to make bike-shedding arguments. They complain about the non-pep8 compliance, show w
by halfdan 6y ago
The author starts by criticising a bike-shedding mentality and then goes on to make bike-shedding arguments. They complain about the non-pep8 compliance, show what pep8 would look like and then argue that there's a better way..
As another commenter pointed out: This is all self-inflicted.
Personally, I don't care how things are formatted, I just want it to be consistent.
- segfaultbuserr 6y ago> They complain about the non-pep8 compliance, show what pep8 would look like and then argue that there's a better way.. It did not suggest a "better" way, just the PEP-8 way. It first complains about the non-PEP-8-compliance formatting, then shows a simpler PEP-8 example, and finally shows what will the initial code look like according to PEP-8.