5 ms·
>where Wolfram has branching from undeterministic applications of rules. I'm not sure how Wolfram can derive unitary evolution. I don't think it's right to cal
by AgentME 7y ago
>where Wolfram has branching from undeterministic applications of rules. I'm not sure how Wolfram can derive unitary evolution.
I don't think it's right to call it nondeterministic: every possible sequence of rules happens, separately. It seems to lend itself easily to the Many-Worlds Interpretation of QM.
- acjohnson55 7y agoI don't know if that's true, because I think the idea of a rule having causal invariance is that the many paths converge anyway into causal sequences of events that always hold.