3 ms·
I think we're talking about two different things. I'm talking about whether or not a price gouger provides the service of making some product available on the
by Consultant32452 7y ago
I think we're talking about two different things. I'm talking about whether or not a price gouger provides the service of making some product available on the market, albeit at a higher price. I feel that fact is indisputable and I personally find that valuable. You seem focused on whether or not you consider this action of making something available to me is moral/legal. That's a different question altogether. One which I'm explicitly not commenting on.
- MisterBastahrd 7y agoYour position is moot. Without the emergency, there would be no incentive for the gouger to source and acquire the product. By acquiring the product, the gouger removes the product from the market for those who are following ethical guidelines, so he's not providing a service at all. You can't disentangle the moral or legal aspects of this just when it suits your whim.
- Consultant32452 7y agoYour position is moot because gougers are not the only ones buying up supply they don't personally need. The gougers price the hoarders out of the market.