3 ms·
The employees certainly knew this could happen, or at least should have been aware what they were getting into. I hope that's the case. Every large company ver
by crispyambulance 7y ago
The employees certainly knew this could happen, or at least should have been aware what they were getting into. I hope that's the case.
Every large company very clearly states, one way or another, that speaking about the company to the public without being a designated spokesperson is seriously grounds for termination.
- aabeshou 7y agothe point isn't "do companies have the legal power to do this" the point is "is it right?" if you lack the moral imagination to consider how the world could be if not for current oppressive power structures, or you blame whistleblowers because "they should have known there'd be consequences," then you're what some like to call "a bootlicker"
- crispyambulance 7y agoI am suggesting that they probably knew the consequences and were OK with the possibility they'd get fired. That's not "blaming the whistleblowers". I actually admire them for taking a stand and accepting the consequences. Amazon should be protecting their warehouse workers. Taking a stand, getting fired under media spot-light for it is actually a really powerful message against Amazon.
- aabeshou 7y agogot it, I misinterpreted your tone, my apologies
- crispyambulance 7y agoThat's OK, no worries!