4 ms·
It has not. The C Committee has taken two votes on this, and in each case, the committee has been equally divided. Without a consensus to change the standard,
by rseacord 6y ago
It has not. The C Committee has taken two votes on this, and in each case, the committee has been equally divided. Without a consensus to change the standard, the status quo wins.
Sounds like you don't care for Annex K. What don't you like about it?
- loeg 6y agoI think my complaints are summed up nicely in some of your coauthors' report: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1967.htm http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1967.htm (1) runtime constraint handler callbacks are a terrible API. (2) The additional boilerplate doesn't buy us anything — the user can still specify the wrong size. (3) The Annex invents a feature out of whole cloth, rather than standardizing existing practices. There are no performant real-world implementations that anyone uses. Microsoft's similar functionality is non-standard.