4 ms·
If you don't have tests for everything, how do you check that everything's still working fine? Because the only alternative I see to not thoroughly test code is
by paulintrognon 7y ago
If you don't have tests for everything, how do you check that everything's still working fine? Because the only alternative I see to not thoroughly test code is to check the app by hand to make sure nothing's broken, which is, well... Not as robust as having it checked by a machine.
- eyelidlessness 7y agoI think the idea isn't that you don't thoroughly test, but that types are sufficient tests of certain functionality, and they're significantly more expressive and efficient than their runtime equivalents.