4 ms·
It’s up to a judge to decide. It has to limited in scope, responsable, and with serious individual suspicion. A lot like current quarantine rulings - mass quara
by hartator 7y ago
It’s up to a judge to decide. It has to limited in scope, responsable, and with serious individual suspicion. A lot like current quarantine rulings - mass quarantines are unconstitutional in the US - but we all forget.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- luckylion 7y ago> It’s up to a judge to decide. Yeah, but he enacts the will of the majority ;) I totally get & agree with the sentiment, but not in the absolutist form. It's always going to be fuzzy, the question is mostly how we weigh the needs of the many and the needs of the few (or the individual). I do believe that the average response to that is strongly reflected in each nation's laws & culture, with the US emphasizing the individual's needs a lot more.
- cortesoft 7y agoYou say they are unconstitutional... where are the court rulings saying this?