3 ms·
Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_purism_in_English https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_purism_in_English
by theandrewbailey 7y ago
Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_purism_in_English https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_purism_in_English
- cmrdporcupine 7y agoI'd be mostly fine with the huge bagload of loanwords if we could at least have a spelling system that made sense for our language, like we used to... 1000 years ago. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/English_spelling_reform https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/English_spelling_reform
- adequateness 7y agoDo you propose adopting the shavian alphabet or just modifying spelling with the latin alphabet?
- cmrdporcupine 7y agoLatin alphabet but with some accents, and the eth/thorn/yogh/wynn/ash (ð/þ/Ȝ/ƿ/æ) characters that English used to have, and Icelandic still has some of. [1] http://www.csun.edu/~sk36711/WWW/KAG/ch2.html http://www.csun.edu/~sk36711/WWW/KAG/ch2.html I'm sure everyone will start using it because I want them to ;-)