5 ms·
My comment was made in reply to GP's and was a description and criticism of what he said. You seemed to have either genuinely or deliberately missed that point.
by knolax 7y ago
My comment was made in reply to GP's and was a description and criticism of what he said. You seemed to have either genuinely or deliberately missed that point. When I clarified this you did not address the content of any of my arguments and instead went on a rant about how "pro CCP" people argue, which is off track because neither the article or I are "pro CCP".
- throwaway_pdp09 7y agoYou have ignored my point that I was precise and did not confuse the issue. Also not answered was why I was supposedly "off track" when I was not. Which is exactly how so many CCP supporters argue.
- knolax 7y agoMy comment was made in direct reference to a previous comment. Claiming that I "made it up" when you can very clearly click parent and see that indeed a parent comment fitting the description given by mine exists is not precise and confuses the point. Your screed and this entire comment thread isn't even remotely related to the article anymore, which means that it is off track. I can keep rebuking you and you'll just keep ignoring it and claim that I didn't. It seems that you've reached the "denial" phase that you've described.
- throwaway_pdp09 7y agoNah, you made it up. And you still haven't answered my questions. Because it's inconvenient.
- throw-45432 7y ago> And you still haven't answered my questions. Because it's inconvenient. No, you just made that up.
- throwaway_pdp09 7y agouser: throw-45432 created: 28 minutes ago karma: 1 Another way CCP apologists deal with difficult things (forgot: flagging is another). You really must think the HN crowd is plain stupid.