3 ms·
LHC: Better safe than sorry.
- Hexstream 18y agoConsidering all the things (none come to mind, sorry) we formerly thought we shouldn't do (because of false beliefs) that turned out to be beneficial in the end, I'd say we should go with the experiments.
- pmjordan 18y ago"Physics" and "conclusive" used together? HA! Besides, if the universe is destroyed, nobody will be around to complain about it.
- tel 18y agoIt's a bit of satirical DH5. Nice.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- pavelludiq 18y agoit's a better idea to use it to fight aliens than to shoot pigeons with it http://xkcd.com/401/ http://xkcd.com/401/
- ivankirigin 18y agoLove it. The precautionary principle is 100% anti-science
- d0mine 18y agoIt reminds me about the true believer in precautionary principle - the Luna Lovegood's father from Harry Potter series: You can't prove it doesn't exist, so it probably does.
- mechanical_fish 18y agoThe good news is that, if we find that it's possible for a civilization like ours to build a machine that can destroy the universe, we'll finally shed some light on that pesky Fermi Paradox. Perhaps I should print up some T-shirts for the occasion: "Humanity: We're Number One!"