2 ms·
I question the truth in that article and whether they really use Razor already. It's barely out, so is MVC3 and I haven't noticed any changes that would suggest
by keyle 16y ago
I question the truth in that article and whether they really use Razor already. It's barely out, so is MVC3 and I haven't noticed any changes that would suggest that they would have converted it all from MVC2 to MVC3. It's a major task.
They might have some Razor in there because it is backwards compatible but to have it all razor is a stretch.
- Jamiecon 16y agoWe're using ASP.NET 4 and MVC 3 in production. New features in both made it very worthwhile to invest the time in conversion. We are not using Razor yet, but it's feasible they are. Take a look at this: https://github.com/telerik/razor-converter https://github.com/telerik/razor-converter