3 ms·
"State" in that context clearly refers to foreign nations (states) not states as in The United States Of America. Foreign power is distinct because it would ref
by kevingadd 7y ago
"State" in that context clearly refers to foreign nations (states) not states as in The United States Of America. Foreign power is distinct because it would refer to things like governments-in-exile or perhaps resistance groups.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- whichquestion 7y ago> No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. It seems to me that it states “with another State”, as in a capital S State or a member State of the United States. Then explicitly calls out as another option, “or with a foreign power”. Furthermore, the title of Article I, Section 10 of the US Constitution is “Powers Prohibited of States”.
- rlt 7y agoWhy would they use two different meanings of "State" (capitalized, no less) in the same sentence?
- Fjolsvith 7y agoThen why would the constitution forbid a foreign nation (state) from entering into an agreement with another foreign power?