> Caol has obvious issues but the failure modes aren't catastrophic. If we don't recognize global warming as a catastrophic failure mode then people are going

> Caol has obvious issues but the failure modes aren't catastrophic. If we don't recognize global warming as a catastrophic failure mode then people are going to disagree on a fundamental level with no space for agreement or understanding of the other persons view. Chernobyl Exclusion Zone is pretty large. Add a few order of magnitude and you get the desert that global warming is causing to grow. It would take quite a few nuclear accident to cause global starvation, but with global warming we are on track for just that future.