> "Probably more fun that losing to someone just because he can move the mouse in response to a visual stimulus faster than you?" If people thought that way, n

> "Probably more fun that losing to someone just because he can move the mouse in response to a visual stimulus faster than you?" If people thought that way, nobody would ever play any real world sports. There's always somebody better out there. Yet here we are... > "If the resulting game is too simplistic, slowing limitations can be added, such as limiting the maximum speed at which the crosshair can move, or making weapon fire deal little damage relative to health so the target can move out of range if near cover before they die." Again, doesn't sound very fun.