4 ms·
No, there is no fallacy. There really isn't. You privacy is NOT more important than a human life, which is exactly what is at stake here. Claiming otherwise is
by DagAgren 7y ago
No, there is no fallacy. There really isn't. You privacy is NOT more important than a human life, which is exactly what is at stake here. Claiming otherwise is utterly sociopathic.
- syshum 7y agoNo it means I would rather die with privacy and liberty than to live in an Authoritarian Dystopia with no liberty or privacy it is not sociopathic to put an extremely high value on privacy and liberty
- DagAgren 7y agoNo, it does not mean that. It means you would rather let OTHER people die with your privacy. You are literally valuing your privacy higher than the life of other people. And yes, that is sociopathic.
- syshum 7y agoSo do you draw any line on this, or should all privacy be void as long as it saves 1 life? For example should I have my every moment monitored because I might hurt someone? Should everyone have to have a BAC monitor on their cars so save people from drunk driving? Just trying to see if there is any limits in your Authoritarian world
- DagAgren 7y agoOf course I draw lines. Any sane person draws lines. And the current situation is far, far beyond that line, as should be blatantly obvious to anyone with a functioning sense of empathy.