4 ms·
IMHO, Gimp was much easier to use before they revamped the GUI to imitate Photoshop. For those who didn’t try it, it looked like this: https://commons.m.wikimed
by cpach 7y ago
IMHO, Gimp was much easier to use before they revamped the GUI to imitate Photoshop. For those who didn’t try it, it looked like this: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cleaning_up_Fourier_screenshot_gimp_1.png https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cleaning_up_Fourie...
- eternalscreams 7y agoThe menu layout and structure looks exactly the same, except it's floating, which you get in modern GIMP by default. Can you explain in more depth how it's tangibly different?
- tetris11 7y agoThe icons are different which still throw me off. The colour select tool is weirdly now stacked behind the cropping tool or some other selection tool.
- RMPR 7y agoThat's why you learn keyboard shortcuts.
- eternalscreams 7y agoYou can move those about though
- syrrim 7y agoShit, that's exactly what photoshop used to look like (photoshop 7)
- Avamander 7y agoIt might've been for you. No discernible difference for me.
- NoOneNew 7y agoUm... I think they need a copy of Photoshop if they're going to try to "imitate" it. They imitated it as closely as chopping onions is similar to learning how to drive a car. I checked it out in January, while doing a month of open source alternatives to Adobe. That's a big no. Adobe is pricey but that money is pumped very well into UI. After playing with some of the open source alternatives... yea, $55 a month is now cheap to me since I now know what crappy UI and ass backwards workflows really look like.