3 ms·
>> bhyve >They don't list anything technically better about bhyve. Why would I use this over xen or kvm? Isn't it actually worse? There doesn't seem to be AMD
by toohotatopic 7y ago
>> bhyve
>They don't list anything technically better about bhyve. Why would I use this over xen or kvm?
Isn't it actually worse? There doesn't seem to be AMD support:
>Hosting Linux guests or FreeBSD guests with more than one vCPU requires VMX unrestricted mode support (UG)
Does AMD have UG or does this mean no AMD support for multi-processor guests?
With Meltdown and Spectre, doesn't this mean that VMs on linux AMD systems provide much better performance, and even better performance per dollar?
- magicalhippo 7y ago> does this mean no AMD support for multi-processor guests I dunno about the details but I've got a Debian VM with 6 vCPUs running on Bhyve, FreeBSD 11.3, on my Threadripper 1920X.
- bonzini 7y agoAMD doesn't need unrestricted guest support, it has always had it.