3 ms·

I've noticed, but this is well known, and it has perhaps been a while since you've said anything substantively new about them. Your views are well known, and e

I've noticed, but this is well known, and it has perhaps been a while since you've said anything substantively new about them. Your views are well known, and easily found via any search engine. There's likely no compelling need to track down and attempt to refute each positive mention. This thread excepted, I've generally not engaged in the converse. I am looking for a truce, where we each get to post whatever new thing we have to report, without having to expend precious energy to deal with redundant rebuttals. If you like, I can append "[naturally tptacek disgrees]" whenever I report anything DANE related to this forum, and save you the trouble... :-)

tptacek 7y ago
I try not to write off topic rebuttals. If you perceive something I write about DNSSEC to be off topic --- for instance, if someone posts that, I don't know, netqmail suddenly supports DANE, and I materialize saying "DANE is dumb", I will accept and concede the criticism that that's unproductive. If, on the other hand, you post "Microsoft has announced it will stop actively impeding people from using DANE for email, this is a momentous step forward for the deployment of DNSSEC", I will probably explain why I strongly believe that not to be the case, and not feel too bad about it. I respect that you disagree and, while I do sometimes resort to overt snark, hope not to personally offend you or anyone else, or, for that matter, to crud up threads so that it's impossible to discuss things without an airing of my own issue agenda. So, while I'm not sure I can honestly offer a "truce", I will try to be more mindful about not disrupting DNSSEC discussions too much.