4 ms·
Not sure why you chose to justify criticising CNN with a single article that was written by a guest, who happens to actually work for Mashable. I don't read CN
by corin_ 16y ago
Not sure why you chose to justify criticising CNN with a single article that was written by a guest, who happens to actually work for Mashable.
I don't read CNN regularly so I won't argue for or against CNN's tech coverage, but if you want to argue against it you should try a little harder.
- Bud 16y agoI think the article referenced in the current thread makes for a pretty good second data point. The author tries to pretend that sales "into the channel" are real sales (they aren't, of course). He pretends that all RAM is equal and directly comparable (on-die RAM is clearly superior). He pretends that megapixels in cameras that are a few mm in size is a hugely important measurement of camera quality (it's not). He pretends that the Nook and Kindle are at all comparable to the iPad or even in the same product category (they manifestly aren't). He pretends that all dual-core CPUs are equivalent (which is laughable). I can't remember the last CNN tech article that I found to be insightful or informative. By contrast, I read a few dozen things via Hacker News daily that pass muster.