4 ms·
Here is a study of "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" done in 2018 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6
by fspeech 7y ago
Here is a study of "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" done in 2018 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178078/ The corresponding author Zheng-Li Shi is also the lead reasearcher of Wuhan lab.
I wish people use peer reviewed articles as supporting evidence when making arguments. These subjects (coronavirus origin and transmission) are well researched and disseminated.
- pengaru 7y agoIs that supposed to be evidence of the covid-19 outbreak originating from the Wuhan lab?
- throwanem 7y agoI wish people who use peer-reviewed articles as supporting evidence when making arguments would do a better job of understanding what those peer-reviewed articles are about. Or, for that matter, of making an argument in the first place. You're not doing that here. You're just noting that a researcher who does research on transmission of coronaviruses from bats to humans, has published research on transmission of coronaviruses from bats to humans. I don't know what conclusion you expect anyone to draw from that.
- fspeech 7y agoPeople can draw their own conclusions. That is what is nice about solid evidence. I will make two notes: 1. Bats can transmit viruses to humans independent of wet markets and research activities and these villagers do travel to cities; 2. This particular research was funded jointly by USA, China and Singapore to monitor possible recurrence of SARS like virus.