3 ms·
I might be missing something, but I fail to see how contact tracing is useful, due to secondary contacts/infections. I.e. contact tracing is like a BFS search
by streetcat1 7y ago
I might be missing something, but I fail to see how contact tracing is useful, due to secondary contacts/infections.
I.e. contact tracing is like a BFS search on a graph.
So, even if you trace the closest contacts, by the time a person takes the test and notify the network, those primary contacts (edge 0) might have infected their own contacts (edge 1) until basically you would need to isolate the whole population.
- pcannons 7y agoYa, I see what you mean. Countries like South Korea and studies from Wuhan seem to indicate there is real value to doing contact tracing though, even without an app. Check this one out from the essay: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/04/09/science.abb6936.full https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/04/09/scie... And Google “Patient 31 South Korea” to get a nice visual of the problem
- pdkl95 7y agoContact tracking is probably useful at the beginning of a new outbreak when the disease is still isolated to a small number of locations. Isolating a few people might prevent the disease from spreading to other areas. As you described, once an outbreak has a foothold in most areas, most people will be within one or two hops from someone who is infected. Also, the potential useful period will be shorter when the incubation period is long. Two weeks of incubation provides a lot of opportunity for someone to spread the infection.
- theatraine 7y agoYou can modify the algorithm to do n-degree contacts as well though and then you can propagate a positive test through the network accounting for time delays. Contact tracing should allow you to be more effective with fewer tests since you can ensure that people who wouldn't normally self-isolate do so.