>still holding off on claiming that this virus ties into that concern... But that claim is not being made here. >then it is not a case of human activists encr

>still holding off on claiming that this virus ties into that concern... But that claim is not being made here. >then it is not a case of human activists encroaching... ...nor is that claim being made. Did you really mean to say activists? Even if it’s a typo and you meant activities, that still is not at all what’s being said. The idea is more about climate patterns and the plausibility that changes in them (regardless of cause) could change migration ranges. BTW when it comes to China, National Review is a pretty biased source.