5 ms·

Anyone else tired of learning and internalizing cool new concepts and then those ideas you had come to adopt and believe in gets debunked/disproven soon after?

Anyone else tired of learning and internalizing cool new concepts and then those ideas you had come to adopt and believe in gets debunked/disproven soon after? Might be better just to not believe anything so you don’t get betrayed anymore lol

lcall 7y ago
I often think about that. It is why I wrote many thoughts about "Maturity Models": the best ideas for any subject (the system being far from ... uh, mature, at this point). But the idea is to take best practices and collate and order them with dependencies, instead of reading thousands of books to know what is "next" for one's own growth in an given subject. The idea is that multiple optionally-integrated-if-and-when-they-want communities of practice could develop. More info buried at at http://lukecall.net http://lukecall.net under Lessons Learned etc etc. Edit: url & minor fixes. Also I hope to eventually progress with this, using my http://onemodel.org http://onemodel.org project. Edit: ideally anything (or any source of info) could be assigned transitive trust levels. Dietary science would get a low one in my system at this time. ;) Physics, math, and epidemiology would probably get much higher ones.
notechback 7y ago
Thesis - antithesis - synthesis. Question would be whether you are better off at the end. Did your journey through these concepts help you improve your own understanding and action?
- Ghjklov 7y ago
  For me, it feels like I've fallen face flat into a puddle of doubt. Yes, believing in some particular idea and putting it to practice felt great at the time, but now the science has said it's bullshit and I'm wrong for believing in it. If I choose to keep believing in it because it makes me feel good, they're going to call me stupid and a science denier! Half joking. I'd rather be stupid, get my sleep, and feel great. ;)

lcall 7y ago

I often think about that. It is why I wrote many thoughts about "Maturity Models": the best ideas for any subject (the system being far from ... uh, mature, at this point). But the idea is to take best practices and collate and order them with dependencies, instead of reading thousands of books to know what is "next" for one's own growth in an given subject. The idea is that multiple optionally-integrated-if-and-when-they-want communities of practice could develop. More info buried at at http://lukecall.net http://lukecall.net under Lessons Learned etc etc. Edit: url & minor fixes. Also I hope to eventually progress with this, using my http://onemodel.org http://onemodel.org project. Edit: ideally anything (or any source of info) could be assigned transitive trust levels. Dietary science would get a low one in my system at this time. ;) Physics, math, and epidemiology would probably get much higher ones.

notechback 7y ago

Thesis - antithesis - synthesis. Question would be whether you are better off at the end. Did your journey through these concepts help you improve your own understanding and action?

Ghjklov 7y ago
For me, it feels like I've fallen face flat into a puddle of doubt. Yes, believing in some particular idea and putting it to practice felt great at the time, but now the science has said it's bullshit and I'm wrong for believing in it. If I choose to keep believing in it because it makes me feel good, they're going to call me stupid and a science denier! Half joking. I'd rather be stupid, get my sleep, and feel great. ;)