There's not really any clean definition of "holography" anyway, and it's a pedantic (and long-since lost) battle to insist that anything that calls itself "holo

There's not really any clean definition of "holography" anyway, and it's a pedantic (and long-since lost) battle to insist that anything that calls itself "holographic" be achieved with wave interference. Besides, they have a lot more in common than you think. This is recreating a (single-parallax) light field - it's not really doing anything different from an imaging perspective than a single-parallax direct-write digital hologram - only the physics differs. The technique is fully generalizable to full-parallax. Saying that it can't be a "hologram" because it doesn't use lasers is a little like saying a Tesla isn't a "car" because it doesn't burn gasoline.