3 ms·

Zoho Mail only costs $2 more per year vs PurelyMail (it's shown on PurelyMail's website along with other competitors) and also avoids the "one man show" problem

Zoho Mail only costs $2 more per year vs PurelyMail (it's shown on PurelyMail's website along with other competitors) and also avoids the "one man show" problem. I'm not sure saving $2 a year is worth using a self-proclaimed (according to its website) beta service. Then again Gmail was in beta for many years.

beagle3 7y ago
Last I checked, Zoho was per address; This guy specifically looked for domain support (meaning, potentially hundreds of addresses). PurelyMail seems to charge by storage, not mailbox address; and AFAIK so does Migadu (which, up until reading this post, I thought was unique in that).
- ocdtrekkie 7y ago
  I will admit it's unfortunate to have to pay per inbox on FastMail. I can't even pay less for my second box to be smaller and more limited, it must be at the same rate as my main box. They do allow infinite aliases which covers most of my needs, but when I wanted to use a FastMail box for my home automation system's service account it didn't make sense to do so.
- mattlondon 7y ago
  Zoho offers catch-all adresses on their service so one inbox can handl hundreds of adresses. Not exactly the same as hundreds of individual addresses/inboxes, but may fit some people's needs. I've been using Zoho like this now for a little while and I am pretty happy with it considering the price.
- inapis 7y ago
  Zoho is per user/inbox but a single user/inbox can receive emails for multiple domains and email ids. You can also set up individual sending identities. I am currently receiving email for 7 domains while paying for one. There is an undocumented limit though. You can generally only have upto 30 aliases.
ocdtrekkie 7y ago
Indeed. I honestly would never go cheap on email again. People have traditionally expected it to be free, but it's the most crucial point of my online presence: I need to be able to rely on it and it needs to be good. In my opinion, the fact that people would pay more for Netflix than their email provider is kinda crazy, when you think about their relative importance.
- Talanes 7y ago
  The majority of people are probably also only using that e-mail to have somewhere for their Netflix receipts to go.
- timc3 7y ago
  Email is obviously really important, but the cost of running Netflix is extremely different to running an email service and I would take that into account with the pricing. But I think Netflix is extremely cheap/good value if you enjoy the content.

beagle3 7y ago

Last I checked, Zoho was per address; This guy specifically looked for domain support (meaning, potentially hundreds of addresses). PurelyMail seems to charge by storage, not mailbox address; and AFAIK so does Migadu (which, up until reading this post, I thought was unique in that).

ocdtrekkie 7y ago
I will admit it's unfortunate to have to pay per inbox on FastMail. I can't even pay less for my second box to be smaller and more limited, it must be at the same rate as my main box. They do allow infinite aliases which covers most of my needs, but when I wanted to use a FastMail box for my home automation system's service account it didn't make sense to do so.
mattlondon 7y ago
Zoho offers catch-all adresses on their service so one inbox can handl hundreds of adresses. Not exactly the same as hundreds of individual addresses/inboxes, but may fit some people's needs. I've been using Zoho like this now for a little while and I am pretty happy with it considering the price.
inapis 7y ago
Zoho is per user/inbox but a single user/inbox can receive emails for multiple domains and email ids. You can also set up individual sending identities. I am currently receiving email for 7 domains while paying for one. There is an undocumented limit though. You can generally only have upto 30 aliases.

ocdtrekkie 7y ago

Indeed. I honestly would never go cheap on email again. People have traditionally expected it to be free, but it's the most crucial point of my online presence: I need to be able to rely on it and it needs to be good. In my opinion, the fact that people would pay more for Netflix than their email provider is kinda crazy, when you think about their relative importance.

Talanes 7y ago
The majority of people are probably also only using that e-mail to have somewhere for their Netflix receipts to go.
timc3 7y ago
Email is obviously really important, but the cost of running Netflix is extremely different to running an email service and I would take that into account with the pricing. But I think Netflix is extremely cheap/good value if you enjoy the content.