2 ms·
While I an not a fan of google for a lot reasons this decision is pretty wacky. This ruling says google must provide a service, but they must also pay those wh
by anfilt 7y ago
While I an not a fan of google for a lot reasons this decision is pretty wacky.
This ruling says google must provide a service, but they must also pay those who use it... How does this make any sense. It’s akin to the government forcing someone to stand at a street corner shouting and advertising for someone. However, every-time a persons goes into the business because your advertising you must pay that business...
Like can google just pull out France? I don't see how anyone could negotiate under such insanity?
Like the bigger issue is BS like AMP that will take traffic away from the sites. Why is that not a concern... Where as indexing things is an old idea. Like if you applied this to card catalogs, phone books, and heck references in papers this ruling makes no sense.