> It's not bad, but they are not paying for this content, even if they have an incentive to display these abstracts And press has an incentive to pay for being

> It's not bad, but they are not paying for this content, even if they have an incentive to display these abstracts And press has an incentive to pay for being propagated in search results. As both sides gain in this exchange even without monetary transaction, there is no obvious way to see who should pay whom and zero price (in both sides) is a reasonable position. It is true that Google being in a monopoly position makes it hard to establish price for 'being announced in search results'.