3 ms·

So essentially each country has control of the physical structure within their borders. This is not different from any other technology. Now, a country can the

So essentially each country has control of the physical structure within their borders. This is not different from any other technology. Now, a country can then hold anything they control as collateral for any other demand they make: France could block a site from the country, they could seize any assets that site has in the country, or arrest personnel in that country. France has a vested interest in not overplaying their hand, such that companies won't operate there at all, but effectively a country has complete power to demand anything in exchange for access to their country. In that way, the Internet is not subject to any country's law in only that country, but every country's law in every country, insofar as those countries are places they want to do business. Nothing here is new and the US is traditionally the largest user of this sort of power.

matheusmoreira 7y ago
> France could block a site from the country That's exactly what will turn the international network into regional ones with tightly controlled borders. Large groups of people simply won't be reachable from the outside. My country blocked WhatsApp for several days when it couldn't decrypt messages for the benefit of an investigation. > they could seize any assets that site has in the country, or arrest personnel in that country And then countries will start requiring that all data concerning their citizens be stored on computers located on their soil and therefore under their jurisduction. That almost made it into law here. How many sites are just gonna block the entire country in response to that? How many are going to be blocked for not complying?