I agree with everything eesmith has said to me so far in our discussion. I apologize for not communicating how seriously I take all of his replies to me, or ho

I agree with everything eesmith has said to me so far in our discussion. I apologize for not communicating how seriously I take all of his replies to me, or how helpful this is for my research I am working on a very fun project making a 3d computer game in unity, its got a beautiful user interface where you can play with the parameters of a single self reproducing machine and it lands on a fake planet and you can do (fake/simulated) physics experiments with imaginary "programmable self-replicating 3d printers" and its all running a physics simulation of what a real planet might be like, but you can adjust these parameters in the game too. It's inspired by John Conway's The Game of Life. It's quite fun! I believe I have discovered an infinite family of new 3-dimensional self reproducing machines, and own the website selfreproducingmachines.com for the purpose of releasing this game as a free open source program when its finished Thank you so much for keeping me in line and helping me with these ideas. It means so much to me. I did not post on this website so heavily because I didn't want to be mercilessly dragged by people like eesmith who know much more about this than me I have many questions about a "fake math" theory I made up, where its kind of like theoretical physics, but its about the mathematical theory of life, evolution, dna; but from first principles I have discovered the existence of mathematical laws which relate the properties of the environment, and the local encoding of a single self reproducing programmable machine, and the way these types of systems tend to evolve Clearly, I am very likely making a large number of conceptual mistakes at this time. This is the purpose for my posting these articles on here. Any advice is most welcome