3 ms·
I've never really understood the need some HN readers have, to insist on a date on anything that wasn't published relatively recently. Especially articles about
by nisse72 7y ago
I've never really understood the need some HN readers have, to insist on a date on anything that wasn't published relatively recently. Especially articles about things that do not change with time.
Maybe every post should have the article's date, so when I read old HN posts there is no room for confusion.
- djannzjkzxn 7y agoThe site is called News so I think it’s worth mentioning when something isn’t news.
- 0xcde4c3db 7y agoIt's often a useful bit of context. It's not simply a matter of the validity of an article, but more that being closer to or farther from an event or discovery often changes how it's framed and discussed. It also helps set expectations about what related things won't be discussed because they hadn't happened at the time. (it also helps clarify that nagging feeling of deja vu; "didn't I read this a few years ago?")
- jdsully 7y agoIts also an obscuring factor. Articles with dates specified don't do nearly as well as articles that appear contemporaneous. You can see this with the performance of titles that get modified by the mods, they seem to slow down significantly after the date is added.