3 ms·
> this is a hard constraint of editions. That's pretty awesome! Should I assume this only applies if a "Rust 2.0" never happens, or is there a commitment to 2.
by chungy 7y ago
> this is a hard constraint of editions.
That's pretty awesome! Should I assume this only applies if a "Rust 2.0" never happens, or is there a commitment to 2.0 never being a thing?
- bluejekyll 7y agoAt this point, what would a 2.0 be exactly? I guess dropping 2015 as a supported source edition?
- steveklabnik 7y agoWe have said there won't be a Rust 2.0. If course, in theory we could change our minds. Can't imagine a current scenario where it makes sense, though.
- worik 7y agoIt would make sense if Rust 2.0 was smaller and less capable. Every improvement added to rust makes it worse for me