3 ms·
The deductions given seems to be strictly based on the initial comment "anecdotal evidence". The original article is deleted/suspended from Medium, as is the u
by Firerouge 6y ago
The deductions given seems to be strictly based on the initial comment "anecdotal evidence".
The original article is deleted/suspended from Medium, as is the user.
The article pushes a pro Trump, anti media agenda, revolving around the use of Hydroxychloroquine.
This probably shouldn't be read as containing any medical consensus
- treeman79 6y agoThis medication has become a political hot potato. President thinks it may help. The Backlash is insane. All these media outlets are hysterical about it. While many doctors are trying it out. Yes article was pro trump. But the hatred of this treatment is absurd. I was seeing a lot of headlines about how the virus attacks blood cells. Now I see none. This crap happens on reddit all the time. Hate to see it here. I follow this treatment closely as it’s been around for years. And I’ve personally benefited from it. However getting doctors to prescribe it has been a nightmare. Every time I get a couple months of normal health when I take the antibiotic. But then I’m out, and it’s years to the next round of it. The constant dismissal from “experts” is insane. Let me try a treatment. Let others try a treatment. So many times I’ve been cold shaking, and doctor still refuses to give an antibiotic. Grab some from a friend. Oh wow I’m better now. Doctor only upset because I went around them.