4 ms·
On the contrary. For example, MSFT is currently trading at ~$165. A single MSFT Put option expiring on March 19, 2021, which gives you the right (but not the ob
by xtreme 6y ago
On the contrary. For example, MSFT is currently trading at ~$165. A single MSFT Put option expiring on March 19, 2021, which gives you the right (but not the obligation) to sell 100 shares of MSFT at $165 at any time before expiry currently costs less than $20. So for $20, you can protect your $16,500 asset from a market downturn for a year. Also, options were significantly cheaper before the recent increase in market volatility.
- raincom 6y agoYou need to multiply that 20 with 100. It costs $2000 to protect $16,500.
- Matheus28 6y agoFor those unfamiliar with it: options are usually quoted per-share (even though almost all of them are sold in contracts of 100 shares), because it makes calculating the break even price a lot easier. For a put costing $20 on a $165 strike, the break even at expiration is $145. Also, you never buy long dated puts ATM in bull markets with the intention of hedging. It's usually much further OTM, since it becomes a lot cheaper. Right now all options are very expensive due to high implied volatility.
- xtreme 6y agoYou are correct, my math was way off. Buying ITM options is definitely not the best way to protect capital.
- H8crilA 6y agoIf it actually costed $20 everyone would be playing Taleb on much of their portfolios :). It is not cheap, and also not so easy to size everything properly. Hedging is not user friendly at all. Robert Shiller often complains about the lack of general public awareness when it comes to hedging. Rationally, if you work in an oil company you should be short oil, but the opposite is much more common to be found in the real world. Similarly with real estate - if you have a big mortgage maybe you should somehow be short on the real estate market elsewhere, just in case your city becomes the next Detroit.