4 ms·
The logogram in OP suppresses Google’s four colors, and so did the one on Google’s blog: https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/apple-and-goog
by mturmon 7y ago
The logogram in OP suppresses Google’s four colors, and so did the one on Google’s blog:
https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/apple-and-google-partner-covid-19-contact-tracing-technology https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/appl...
Also, the Apple logo is first. I wonder how this was decided?
- trendoid 7y agoAlphabetically and/or birthdate
- chess_buster 7y agoAlphabetically maybe.
- mbreese 7y agoMy guess (hope) is a group of reasonable adults talking about this collaboration (remotely) decided that the order of logos was of far less importance than them working together. Someone probably said — “how about this?” and scribbled something. May have even been a Googler. Then everyone else just said “sure”. At least, that’s how I’d like to think it went.
- dylan604 7y agoA comes before G? Logo designs typically have a logo followed by text. Seems to apply here too. It might not be anything about who can pee further.
- ummonk 7y ago> Logo designs typically have a logo followed by text This. It would look weird if the order were the other way around.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- adrianmonk 7y agoPersonally, I would choose to put the Apple logo first on aesthetic grounds. Not because I like that logo better but because it is smaller. Since English reads left to right, if the short thing comes after the long thing, it looks lopsided. Also, since the Google logo is larger, it is going to be more prominent no matter what, so putting the Apple logo first balances that out a bit. Seems fair to me.