> The obvious, implicit motivation behind an article like this is to help other users make the same decision. This is not obvious to me. Why do you assume the

> The obvious, implicit motivation behind an article like this is to help other users make the same decision. This is not obvious to me. Why do you assume the motivation is "to help other users make the same decision" and not "to help other users make the decision that's right for them"? I promise you that some people have sometimes written with that motivation in mind. If any denial is taken as proof of guilt, how do you tell those people apart?