3 ms·
I like to be a grammar Nazi as much as the next guy, but honestly I'm over this one. It seems that the logical fallacy definition of "begs the question" has no
by ryandvm 7y ago
I like to be a grammar Nazi as much as the next guy, but honestly I'm over this one.
It seems that the logical fallacy definition of "begs the question" has now become a recursive example of question begging itself. The only reason it means self-referencing argument is because 10% of the population believes it does. I'm half-convinced this was all just some linguist's April Fool's prank gone awry.
The reality is the literal definition of "begs the question" is commonly accepted, well understood, and frankly, makes a hell of lot more sense. I'm fairly certain that it is the only definition for that term that is held by a majority of English speakers. If that doesn't make it the official definition, then what does? There is no English Language Preservation Organization. If most people think that is what it means, then that is what it means.