3 ms·
While the example was bad (too general, a potential for copy&paste from somewhere else), it was certainly not for the reason OP wrote: > The exercise was suppo
by stared 7y ago
While the example was bad (too general, a potential for copy&paste from somewhere else), it was certainly not for the reason OP wrote:
> The exercise was supposed to take "a few hours" according to the hiring manager, but I'm extremely rusty with ASP.
Well, if they look for an ASP expert, this self-selection saves time on both sides!
I use take-home assignments with boilerplate code, to reduce the initial time investment and make it easier to compare parts of the projects. (Otherwise, it may be a too open-ended task.)
I try to make sure that the skills I require the skills I need. For example, when I needed a deep learning engineer (for a PyTorch project), I expect fluency in at least one deep learning framework. I made it explicit that instead PyTorch boilerplate then can use any other framework (a few people send in Keras).
Yes, people can Google things (good!). And it some sense it balances more junior people (but willing to put more effort) with people with more experience. The later could be told easily by interview. When I ask questions about their solutions, it is easy to see which parts are done with understanding, which - not.
- gwbas1c 7y agoOP here. The reason why the stack requirement bothered me was that, during the phone screening, I basically told the hiring manager that take-homes are fine, but I walk away from anything that has a laundry list of required frameworks. They were looking for a very senior developer, not someone who would come in and know their stack on day 1. In my case, the problem wasn't ASP, it was all the other frameworks and patterns they wanted.