> I presume that none of the hoaxers actually reference the weather radar issue? I have never seen them do this, and I think it's unlikely they will do enough

> I presume that none of the hoaxers actually reference the weather radar issue? I have never seen them do this, and I think it's unlikely they will do enough research on 5G (despite telling everyone else to "do the research") to learn about this. > Let's hope it stays that way because it's much harder to dismiss it all as a hoax if they mix in real truth with all the other bogus stuff. I'd say they already do this, but I'm not sure they do, and I'm not sure they need to. Conspiracy theorists don't rely on facts to bolster their narrative; they rely on things that sound like facts.