It is hard to tell there, because someone who commits a physical crime is much more likely to get caught than someone who does not, but it does seem like some r

It is hard to tell there, because someone who commits a physical crime is much more likely to get caught than someone who does not, but it does seem like some resources should be devoted to the dangerous ones. This doesn't excuse the government trying to destroy security for everyone else. One of the biggest problems highlighted by the NYTimes is insufficient funding leading to an inability to apprehend culprits, not the widespread use of end-to-end encryption.