4 ms·
Why did Nature publish a proof that is widely considered to be fatally flawed, i.e. not a proof? https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709 https://
by danharaj 7y ago
Why did Nature publish a proof that is widely considered to be fatally flawed, i.e. not a proof? https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709 https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709
How did the Bogdanoff affair happen?
The fact that bullshit is hard to separate from "the truth" is a very good starting point for postmodern investigation.